Send the decision your operation depends on.

If your team is dealing with operational decisions under constraints, send the rough context. The first exchange is for scoping the decision, the data, the predictions, the approval path, and the shortest credible path toward software your team can use.

Enough detail to place the work.

  • What operational decision are you trying to improve?
  • What data, constraints, predictions, or live events matter?
  • Where should the recommendation land: API, product, internal tool, dashboard, or workflow?
  • Who needs to inspect, approve, or act on the result?

A rough description is fine. Helpful extras: current stack, data sources, examples of failed or manual decisions, hard constraints, and approval needs.

If the current process lives in spreadsheets, internal tooling, or a product workflow, say that explicitly. That usually makes the first conversation faster.

Start with email.

Email is the best path for project inquiries. The other channels are available if you want a lighter first touch or you want to inspect the technical proof before reaching out directly.

What makes scoping faster.

  • The current process lives in spreadsheets, brittle rules, internal tooling, or a product workflow.
  • A schedule, route, recommendation, approval, or repair decision is creating cost, delay, risk, or manual cleanup.
  • Known constraints, prediction inputs, live events, exceptions, or approval paths affect the decision.
  • The output needs to land in an API, product, internal tool, dashboard, or operating workflow.

A rough operational decision is enough.

If you are not sure whether the request is a SolverForge build, send the operational decision behind it. A rough description is enough to decide whether discovery, implementation, integration, or a simpler path makes sense.

Email SolverForge AI